To solve this, Australia resorted to a social media ban on people under the age of 16 that has been in place since December 2025. It has banned 10 social media apps, including YouTube, TikTok, and Facebook. The purpose of this ban was to reduce social media use and improve online safety. However, studies show that this is in fact the opposite! According to a survey conducted by the Molly Rose Foundation, it shows that over 51% of children using social media think that the ban has made no difference in their online safety.
Furthermore, more research from the Molly Rose Foundation has shown that over 61% of Australian 12-15-year-olds still have access to 1-2 social media accounts, even after the ban was issued. This proves ineffective when solving the second goal: to decrease social media usage for children and teens. Many people can also access hundreds of other social media apps, since the government banned only 10 social media apps. This creates many loopholes and makes the ban more ineffective.
I think that the government should take a different approach when solving this problem. They need to consider the needs and the lives of all the kids and teenagers in Australia. Instead of a rigid social-media ban, they should take measures to solve all of the loopholes, while also allowing certain apps and ways for teenagers to communicate with each other. This would not only solve the social media problem, but would make the ban adaptable for everyone, since some teenagers and kids use social media as their main way to communicate with their friends.