However, some analysts argue that Iran is receiving more immediate benefits from the deal than the United States. Nicole Grajewski, an Iran foreign-policy expert at Sciences Po, said the agreement appears to favor Iran because Tehran receives economic benefits and reduced military pressure while making only limited new nuclear commitments. Critics are especially concerned that allowing oil sales and related financial transactions could weaken some of the United States’ strongest economic pressure on Iran.
The Trump administration argues that the United States still has leverage because many sanctions will remain and a final agreement will require Iran to follow nuclear restrictions. Supporters of diplomacy also say the deal could create a new opportunity for U.S.-Iran relations after months of war. Still, the hardest questions—including the exact limits to place on Iran’s nuclear program—have been delayed. The two countries now have 60 days of further talks to determine whether the temporary agreement can lead to a broader deal.