Thus, students have begun to question why these devices are used, and if their right to personal privacy is necessary. Many students took action, such as Schromm, who is 17 and a senior in California. Schromm sent the entire student body an email that included a survey for their peers about restrictions and non privacy on school-issued Chromebook. Among the respondents of the survey, 90 percent of them agreed with the statement “Being required to use a device that is explicitly ‘not private’ makes me uncomfortable.” The evidence shows that a very large majority of respondents feel uneasy about using devices that are not private.
Many people argue that students shouldn’t have privacy on school devices primarily due to their safety, security, and more focus on academic projects instead of playing games or using unhealthy applications during class time. Other people also engage the use of AI for more efficiency and can solve more complex problems in less time. But with privacy on school-issued Chromebooks, students may explore more ideas, engage in creative problems, and create a safe space for personal growth. For example, they could experiment with new art projects, or collaborate on innovative science experiments. In contrast, the increasing use of AI in daily life could harm adolescents’ mental health. For instance, excessive reliance on AI-generated content may reduce critical thinking.